BOARD MEETING MINUTES
December 6, 2007 –6:30 p.m.
Chairman Beske called the meeting to order. Also present were Supervisors Shapiro Hurley, Sperle and Lunde, Clerk George, Treasurer Sime and Constable Reilly.
The use of cul-de-sacs on Rutland Dunn Townline Rd. would be of great concern because of the added time necessary for emergency response if emergency vehicles had to go around Starr School Road.
David Nelson would like to be notified of any future public meetings.
1) Preliminary inquiry from Mike & Laura Gronier of Lamis Properties regarding CUP for daycare at 608 Hwy MM.
Current zoning is RH2; proposed zoning is RH2 with a Conditional Use Permit.
Beske indicated letters had been sent to the neighbors to inform them of this proposal.
There were no neighbors present to speak for or against the proposal.
Laura Gronier indicated her husband, Mike, had talked to the neighbors next door,
Beethams, and they did not object.
Prosposal is to accommodate 35-45 full-time students. However, Laura Gronier stated
there is also a significant need for before and after school care and they would like to
take an entire family with children 2 and over through school age. The building would be
about 3,000 sq. ft. and use all or a portion of the 6 acre property.
The property was viewed by the planning commission on November 10.
Concerns include: volume of traffic, number of employees and children, adequate paved
driveway which is wide enough for 2 cars to pass easily, septic and well size. Sime
expressed concerns that a case could be made for zoning this commercial, and he felt
that would be appropriate.
--Consensus informally that Mike and Laura Gronier should proceed by applying to the
county for a conditional use permit with RH2 zoning.
The Board took no action on this matter, but did note that the number of parking spaces
would need to be looked at when the final plans are submitted. It was also noted that the
double driveway might be a future concern if the ownership of the adjoining property
changed.
2) Duane Swalheim, agent for Robert Meyer, inquiry regarding possible splits for property at 3956 Hwy 138.
Present zoning A-1 Ex; Proposed RH-1on the split of the house and buildings on
approximately 3.7 acres.
A survey was done for Duane Swalheim, 436 Connie Street, Cottage Grove, WI 53527.
The owner of record is Robert H. Meyer, Jr. Rev. Living Trust, 3956 State Hwy 138,
Stoughton. Property address is 3956 State Hwy. 138, Stoughton.
There are 282 acres with no splits to date. Therefore, 8 splits are allowed which creates
9 parcels. This would be the 1st of 8 splits.
The planning commission members indicated that livestock could not be put in the
buildings on the west lot line, since there is not 50 feet for a side setback.
--No formal action. Duane Swalheim will now file with the county.
No Town Board action on this matter at this time.
3) Richard Snorek—Preliminary CSM Approved on 4/30/07 Planning Commission. Present zoning RH-1. Proposed zoning RH-1.
Proposal is to consolidate 2 CSM’s into one CSM, contingent on review by the Town
Engineer. (There were no escrow funds submitted and the board will determine if
the clerk can sign off or the town engineer needs to review).
--Motion made to consolidate the two parcels (CSM’s) contingent on approval by Town
Engineer—Recommendation to approve map# AB 3456-07.
Shapiro Hurley moved, Lunde seconded, to accept the Planning Commission
recommendation to approve the Snorek CSM as presented; motion carried unanimously.
The Board determined that no escrow fees are necessary as no review by the town
engineer is necessary.
4) Appearances for preliminary inquiries and information.
Roatch’s desire is to tear down the garage, build a larger pole shed and either remodel
the house or tear it down and build a new house.
The options were discussed with him concerning leaving it two parcels or combining it
into 1 parcel. At present the septic field is under the driveway. He was advised to check
to see if that is permitted with new construction. He was also advised to determine if the
present buildings conform to setback requirements. If it is nonconforming, improvements
are limited to l/2 of the assessed value of the improvement. The current value of the
improvements is $49,600. If it is conforming, there is no limit to the value of
improvements. He was also advised that if he builds a new house, he has 90 days after
the occupancy permit for the new house is granted, to remove the old house. --No
action. He may apply at the county to combine parcels if he chooses to purchase this
property. No Town Board action.
Further review must be done to determine how many acres Les Swanson has (how
many acres the property was in 1978)—Is it 104.5 or 105? And how many splits the
property was entitled to. One split (Drea) was taken in 1979 and he is entitled to one
more split if the acreage is 104.5 acres. However, if the acreage is determined to be 105,
he is entitled to 2 more splits. --Action—Viewing is set for Saturday, December 8 at 8:30
a.m. Swanson will need to determine if DOT will allow him to use the existing ag
driveway on Hwy 138 or the driveway on Hill Road. The Board will need to resolve the
split issue.
Shapiro Hurley moved, Sperle seconded, to approve the consent agenda; motion
carried.
The memo from the town attorney sets forth the Procedure for the Property Owners to create a Private Cemetery. The attorney feels that the town has the authority to deny the request, but also recommends the town enact an ordinance setting forth the standards and procedures by which the town reviews and approves of proposed cemeteries.
The property owner will be advised that in the town’s opinion, the absence of a town ordinance permitting smaller cemeteries, the need to have 20 acres and the need to license a cemetery would preclude the creation of a private cemetery on their property.
The patrolmen will be asked to put better markers delineating the edge of the landfill cap when weather permits.
The patrolmen will be advised that when a new gate is installed at the collection center, a new fence should be installed from the existing fence to the new gate on the east side of the driveway only and not around the entire property. (There is already an existing fence on the west side of the driveway.)
Respectfully Submitted,
Dawn George, Clerk
|
Copyright © 2006 Town of Rutland, Dane County, Wisconsin Dawn George, Clerk Webmaster: webmaster@town.rutland.wi.us Updated: December 17, 2007 |
|